From the lab · Demo set two · Modelling to a standard

TideCrux 100.
An underwater ROV, built to a feature standard.

ScoutCrux showed an agent carrying a brief through to a changed design. TideCrux asks whether the model itself is any good. An AI agent built a harbour-inspection ROV in SOLIDWORKS 2026 through its API, to a written modelling standard: fully defined sketches with named dimensions, the right feature for each job, and parts from the ParaCrux libraries. Then it audited every part, checked the assembly and drew it.

Lab work. The agent drove SOLIDWORKS through its API in our lab; building assemblies like this is not yet a shipping Agent feature. The ROV has not been built, pressure-tested or sea-trialled, and the bought-in thrusters, lights and camera are envelope models.

This is the CAD itself in the ParaCrux Viewer, converted from the SOLIDWORKS STEP export with every face and edge kept. Bought-in parts are envelopes from nominal dimensions, not supplier models.

The brief.

A port authority dive team wants a two-person-portable ROV to inspect quay walls, pile caps and moorings down to 100 m in tidal current, with a tilting camera, two lights and a replaceable battery. A fictional brief, sized by hand calculation before any geometry.

59components in the assembly
16part numbers, plus 7 library fasteners
38/38sketches fully defined
0Fixed relations

The concept was approved, then frozen into one parameter file. Changing a value there is the only way to change the design, for TideCrux 100 and for the 300.

Sketches that say what they mean.

Every sketch is fully defined with centrelines, relations and named driving dimensions from the origin and datums. No Fixed relations, anywhere. SOLIDWORKS reports the definition state after every sketch closes, and the agent logs it.

185named driving dimensions logged
53equations across the parts
9global variables drive the side frame
29parts in the reuse cache

The frame is driven, not drawn.

The side frame's 3D bend path is dimensioned to planes from global variables. Change one and the bends, the fillets and the cut length follow. The housing tube's wall follows the pipe schedule through equations, which is how the 300 m change gets a thicker wall without anyone redrawing it.

  • skid_drop
  • rail_rise
  • hug_half_width
  • hug_half_length
  • corner_half_width
  • corner_half_length
  • bend_clr
  • tube_od
  • tube_wall

Each feature earns its place.

Hole Wizard for hardware holes, patterns and mirrors for repeats, and the feature a manufacturer would recognise for each part: a moulding, a bent tube, a profile, a folded blank, a turned cap.

  1. 01 · TC-101 fairing

    Loft and shell

    Lofted through 6 symmetric stations, each a fully defined sketch, then shelled to 3 mm and left open underneath. Decorative bosses go on after the shell so they cannot collapse it.

  2. 02 · TC-101 fairing

    Drafted bosses and sponsons

    A moulded part needs draft. The sponson is drafted 9° and mirrored; the screw bosses are drafted 1° and run up to the inside of the skin.

  3. 03 · TC-101, TC-302, TC-401

    Hole Wizard, at a located position

    M3 × 0.5 tapped holes in the bosses: one hole dimensioned to 90 and 100 mm, then mirrored twice. 8 M10 × 1.5 penetrator ports on a 64 mm pitch circle, by dimension, then patterned.

  4. 04 · Fairing, end cap, tray, spider

    Patterns and mirrors for repeats

    Vents as a linear pattern of 4 mirrored to port, penetrator ports as a circular pattern, tray clamp holes patterned then mirrored front to rear and side to side, and one spider spoke patterned to three.

  5. 05 · TC-201 side frame

    3D-sketch bent-tube sweep

    Bend points are dimensioned to planes from global variables, sketch fillets at the 65 mm bend radius (2.6 D) are tied to bend_clr by equations, and a thin 25 × 2.0 circular sweep follows the path. Swept volume 195,122.8 mm³ against 195,121.8 mm³ from πr²L.

  6. 06 · TC-202 cross member

    ParaCrux structural member

    The straight cross members are structural members from the ParaCrux EN 755 aluminium round-tube profile, 25 × 2.0, so they come out in a cut list. Volume 51,157.7 mm³, matching the profile exactly.

  7. 07 · TC-401 chassis tray

    Sheet metal with a flat pattern

    A 3 mm 6061-T6 base flange from an open U profile, with its flat pattern and a DXF of the blank for cutting.

  8. 08 · TC-302, TC-303

    Revolved caps with real seal glands

    End caps revolved with two radial O-ring glands each and a lead-in chamfer. A 3.53 mm section in a 2.79 × 4.7 mm gland gives 21.0 % squeeze and 74.6 % fill: screening values, to be confirmed against ISO 3601-2.

TC-201 bend table (LRA). Tube 25 × 2.0 EN AW-6060 T66, centreline radius 65 mm, cut length 1,350.2 mm. One part serves both sides.
BendL, straight (mm)R, rotation (°)A, angle (°)Arc (mm)
177.00.090.0102.1
274.0-90.023.226.3
3193.30.023.226.3
474.090.090.0102.1
577.00.090.0102.1
674.0-90.023.226.3
7193.30.023.226.3
874.090.090.0102.1
The TC-101 fairing on its own: lofted hull with drafted sponsons, visor recess, vent slots and the raised deck hatch
TC-101 fairing: loft, shell, drafted sponsons and bosses, visor recess, patterned vents, Hole Wizard holes. 64 features, no rebuild errors.

An audit that has to catch something.

After the build, an auditor opens every part and checks it against the standard: definition, Fixed relations, feature names, Hole Wizard use, patterns and mirrors. A deliberately bad part goes through with them. If the audit cannot catch that, its clean results mean nothing.

PartSketchesModelling featuresHole WizardPatternsMirrorsEquationsFindings
TC-10114/1422114–None
TC-2011/11–––41None
TC-2021/11–––2None
TC-3011/11–––6None
TC-3021/1411––None
TC-3032/23––––None
TC-3041/11–––4None
TC-4011/15112–None
TC-4022/22––––None
TC-5012/241–1–None
TC-5024/44––––None
TC-5032/23–1––None
TC-B013/34–1––None
TC-B021/11––––None
TC-B031/11––––None
TC-B101/11––––None

Round cuts that are not hardware holes.

The rule says hardware holes come from Hole Wizard. Every other round cut is listed for review with its reason, rather than hidden or forced through Hole Wizard.

  • TC-101 · Thruster tunnelsflow opening for the vertical thrusters (not a fastener hole)
  • TC-101 · Camera window boreoptical opening behind the visor
  • TC-101 · Light boresoptical openings for the LED modules
  • TC-303 · Dome boreoptical opening for the camera dome
  • TC-402 · Housing cradlesaddle seat concentric with the housing (not a hole)
  • TC-502 · Duct seat cutthruster duct seat (not a fastener hole)
Extruded cut 17Extrude 8Mirror 7Fillet 6Hole Wizard 4Revolve 4Circular pattern 3Linear pattern 2Chamfer 2Loft 1Shell 1Sweep 1Structural member 1Sheet-metal base flange 1

The logs keep the failures.

Every stage is recorded and logged, and runs are appended, never overwritten. These went wrong first and were fixed in the model.

  • The first hull run failed to mirror the vents

    It also left the vent-slot sketch under-defined. The second run fixed both, and the log keeps the failed run.

  • The first bend path had no solution

    The sweep had zero volume and the part saved with errors. The path was rebuilt from the same named variables until it solved. It never fell back to Fixed points.

  • End-cap and dome profiles were under-defined

    Three sketches on the first housings run, two on the second. Relations and named dimensions were added until all were fully defined.

  • The tray's clearance holes would not go in

    The M5 Hole Wizard step failed on three chassis runs before the hole was located on the tray, then patterned and mirrored.

  • Interference detection failed three times

    The tray was narrowed to clear the vertical-thruster tunnels and the clamps moved so each lands under the tray. The fourth run found only the designed O-ring squeeze.

  • The audit's own self-test failed once

    On one run the seeded negative part did not produce the expected findings. The auditor was corrected and run again before its results counted.

Checked as an assembly.

Interference, mass, centre of gravity and buoyancy, read from SOLIDWORKS for all 59 components.

Interference0 unexpected

4 found, all designed: O-ring radial squeeze 21% (designed), one per O-ring.

Mass (CAD)6.82 kg

Volume × ParaCrux material density. No battery, electronics or harness parts yet, so this is not the dry-mass result.

Centre of gravity0.0, -11.4, -14.1 mm

x, y, z in the vehicle frame: x to starboard, y up, z forward. Centred side to side.

Buoyancy−0.73 kg

Net in sea water before foam, from 5.94 L displaced. 1.07 L of 200 kg/m³ foam brings it to +0.15 kg.

Components are placed at documented positions from the parameter file rather than mated. Buoyancy uses sea water at 1,025 kg/m³. These are CAD results and screening calculations, not a tank test.

The brief, and where it stands.

Status comes from evidence, not intent. The engineering record has the full list and the calculations behind each line.

IDRequirementEvidence today
R01Frame envelope ≤ 460 × 350 × 270 mm (revision 0)Approved cage 525 × 525 × 232 mm. Re-baselined; see the record Fail
R04Housing collapse ≥ 3 × rated pressureSch 10: 10.4 × at 100 m · Sch 40: 19.2 × at 300 m. FEA buckling study pending Screening
R05Two O-rings per static seal, glands sized to ISO 3601Two glands per cap · 21.0 % squeeze · 74.6 % fill Screening
R06Net buoyancy +0.10 to +0.20 kg, CB above CG−0.73 kg before foam · 1.07 L of foam for +0.15 kg Open
R12Every part passes the feature-standard audit16 parts · 0 findings · seeded negative caught Pass
R13Drawings to the selected standard (BS 8888)6 sheets produced; drawing audit to follow In progress
R14TideCrux 300 rebuilds from the same parameters, every check rerun5 regenerated · 1 new · 11 reused · checks rerunning In progress

R01 fails honestly: the revision-0 envelope was proposed before the bent-tube cage, and the approved cage is wider and longer. It was re-baselined, and the record keeps the failure and the decision. Screening figures use stated assumptions; the housing still needs an FEA buckling study, and there is no hydrostatic proof test in this demo.

Built from ParaCrux libraries.

Fasteners, materials, appearances and profiles come from ParaCrux, not from one-off geometry, and parts are reused rather than rebuilt.

ParaCrux Toolbox · Global Standard

Fasteners in A4 stainless.

  • ISO 4032 M4 hex nutA4-70
  • ISO 4032 M5 hex nutA4-70
  • ISO 4762 M3x8 socket head cap screwA4-70
  • ISO 4762 M4x12 socket head cap screwA4-70
  • ISO 4762 M5x20 socket head cap screwA4-70
  • ISO 7089:2000 M5 washerA4
  • ISO 7380-1 M5x10 button head screwA4-70

Generated from an approved library release as STEP, then made into SOLIDWORKS parts on the workstation with the ParaCrux material and the library stamp as custom properties. Volume matches the generator exactly. They are envelopes: threads are not modelled.

ParaCrux Materials

Real grades, one database.

  • FairingPC+ABS – Bayblend T65 XF
  • Frame tubeEN AW-6060 T66
  • Housings, caps, trayEN AW-6061 T6
  • Camera domePMMA (cast)
  • SaddlesPOM-C
  • Fasteners1.4401 X5CrNiMo17-12-2 sheet
  • O-ringsSOLIDWORKS Rubber (stock)

The O-rings use the stock SOLIDWORKS rubber because the ParaCrux library has no elastomers yet. That gap is logged as MAT-GAP-01.

ParaCrux Profiles · part reuse

One tube, two ways.

The 25 × 2.0 mm aluminium round tube from the ParaCrux EN profiles is a structural member in the cross members, and the same section is swept along the bent frame.

Each part is cached under a SHA-256 key of its design parameters and builder code. A stage rebuilds a part only when its key changes, assemblies only place cached parts, and library hardware is converted once.

Twelve ParaCrux appearance presets used on TideCrux, shown as spheres: charcoal PC/ABS, safety orange, clear acrylic, yellow syntactic foam, anodised and bead-blasted aluminium, stainless steel and others
ParaCrux appearances on TideCrux, exported to SOLIDWORKS as .p2m. Authored appearance choices, not measured material data.

Then the brief changes: 300 m.

Re-rate it to 300 m and add a one-function gripper. Keep the frame footprint, battery and electronics tray. The design changes through catalogue choices in the parameter file, not by scaling.

ItemTideCrux 100TideCrux 300Why (screening)
Rated depth100 m300 mThe change request
HousingNPS 4 Sch 10NPS 4 Sch 40Sch 10 collapse margin falls to 2.75 ×, under the 3 × rule; Sch 40 gives 15.2 ×
Housing wall3.05 mm6.02 mmFollows the schedule through the housing equations
Camera dome6 mm PMMA10 mm PMMAThe membrane needs 9.4 mm at 300 m; a flat port would need 27.6 mm
Buoyancy foam200 kg/m³400 kg/m³Shallow foam is not rated for 300 m; the deep grade is heavier, so more is needed
Gripper moduleNoneFittedThe change request
Frame, tray, batteryUnchangedRetained by the brief
TideCrux 100 rendered in SOLIDWORKSTideCrux 300 rendered in SOLIDWORKS, with the gripper module on the front cross member
TideCrux 100 (left) and 300 (right), rendered in SOLIDWORKS from the two assemblies.
Regenerated5 parts

TC-301 (Main housing tube), TC-302 (Rear end cap), TC-303 (Front dome flange), TC-304 (Camera dome), TC-B10 (O-ring 106.2 x 3.53 NBR 70 (ISO 3601)), from the 300's values in the parameter file.

New1 part

TC-701: Gripper module, bought-in (envelope), on the front cross member.

Reused11 parts

Unchanged parts come straight from the cache: the frame, fairing, tray and brackets are not rebuilt.

Equation checkIdentical

Editing "housing_wall" = 6.02 in TC-301 gives 491,480 mm³, the same as regenerating the part (491,480 mm³).

TideCrux 300 assembly, 60 components: no unexpected interferences. CAD mass 7.64 kg; −1.47 kg before foam, so 2.59 L of 400 kg/m³ foam is needed for +0.15 kg.

Drawn to BS 8888.

First-angle projection, ISO 2768-mK general tolerances, a parts list and balloons on the general arrangement, and a note on the sheet that it was prepared by an AI agent and has not been checked or approved.

TideCrux 100

TideCrux 300

Read the engineering record (PDF): requirement status, screening calculations, design-intent evidence, parts, hardware, bend schedule, standards and the manufacturing review ↗

What this demonstrates, and what it doesn't.

An agent can model to a written standard, prove that its own audit catches a bad part, check the assembly and draw it, and say which requirements are still open. It does not show a vehicle ready for the water. There has been no hydrostatic proof test, tank trim or sea trial, and every pressure, buoyancy and drag figure is a screening calculation with stated assumptions. Thrusters, lights and the camera are envelope models, and the library fasteners have no threads. The O-rings use stock SOLIDWORKS rubber until the ParaCrux library has elastomers. Requirement R01 failed against its revision-0 envelope and was re-baselined.

See demo set one: ScoutCrux →See what the Agent ships today →Back to all demos →